Hi Bill,
problem indeed.
Just suggestion/question - the NFS client running on SL 6.x is
configured to use also NFSv4 protocol? Eg.
mount -t nfs -o vers=4 server:/data /tmp
btw i think Red Hat been solving something similar here:
'NFS client using NFSv4 ACLs loses the correct mask of a newly created
file in subdirectories'
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/447803
unfortunately 'subscriber content' which i'm not, maybe you? :-)
On 11/08/2016 06:19 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Hi again
My research has revealed that nfs in SL 7.2 is translating the POSIX ACL to
NFSv4 ACL (a completely different format).
vi appears to recognise NFSv4 ACL, but Nautilus, ls and probably other
programs, only seem to recognise POSIX ACL.
So I have the following alternatives:
1. Stop nfs translating to NFSv4 ACL
2. Change the guest mount to translate NFSv4 ACL back to POSIX ACL
3. Change Nautilus, etc to recognise NFSv4 ACL
4. Use Samba instead of nfs
I'm not sure if 1. or 2. are possible and 3. may happen one day. Does anyone
know of a practical solution/workaround?
Cheers
Bill
-----Original message-----
From:Bill Maidment <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday 6th November 2016 19:56
To: Karel Lang AFD <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: RE: ACL Problem in SL7.2
Thanks for the response Karel.
umask is the standard 0022 and this is a top level directory on the host
machine.
I am using SL 6.8 to access the directory via nfs share.
It looks like there is no problem if the file is created with vi
But if I use Nautilus then that's when I get the issue.
So Nautilus on SL 6.8 seems to be the culprit (or is it caused by nfs?)
Cheers
Bill
-----Original message-----
From:Karel Lang AFD <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday 6th November 2016 16:16
To: Bill Maidment <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: ACL Problem in SL7.2
Hi Bill
just pasted your work here to CLI and works OK on SL 6.7 and SL 7.2 here...
It has to be something else .. umask? or inherited from directory higher up?
Maybe strace would help to see whats happening exactly?
cheers
On 11/06/2016 03:58 AM, Bill Maidment wrote:
Hi
I am trying to set up ACL on a directory such that any new file created in the
directory has permissions of 0660.
However, when I create a new file, the permissions are set as 0664 (see
test.txt file below)
Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?
These are the commands I used:
chmod -R u+rwX,g+rwXs,o-rwx /pictures
setfacl -d -m u::rwx,g::rwx,o::--- /pictures
getfacl /pictures
getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names
# file: pictures
# owner: nfs01
# group: nfs01
# flags: -s-
user::rwx
group::rwx
other::---
default:user::rwx
default:group::rwx
default:other::---
ls -latrh /pictures
total 4.0K
dr-xr-xr-x. 22 root root 4.0K Nov 6 12:41 ..
drwxrws---+ 2 nfs01 nfs01 21 Nov 6 13:10 Testing
-rw-rw-r-- 1 nfs01 nfs01 0 Nov 6 13:44 test.txt
drwxrws---+ 3 nfs01 nfs01 35 Nov 6 13:44 .
Cheers
Bill Maidment
--
*Karel Lang*
*Unix/Linux Administration*
[email protected] | +420 731 13 40 40
AUFEER DESIGN, s.r.o. | www.aufeerdesign.cz
