Hi 

My colleague Victor tried to send this but it got bounced back not sure
if got through to anyone!

see below 

Regards
Paul Myers 



-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Victor Walsh <[email protected]>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
<[email protected]>, Paul Myers
<[email protected]>, Mohammed Salim <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: repos for latest updates in scientific linux are
not working]
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 13:14:43 +0000

Hi Stephan,


I had tested this yesterday and the files below were definitely
incorrect on the rsync repos


7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/pangomm-devel-2.34.0-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/p11-kit-trust-0.20.7-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
7.2/x86_64/updates/security/pciutils-libs-3.5.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
7.3/x86_64/os/Packages/pangomm-doc-2.34.0-3.el7.noarch.rpm


I tested against a number of mirrors globally with the same result.  The
repos accessed via http seemed not to be affected until this morning
(London GMT) where both rsync and http repos show the same incorrect
file.  The mirrors I tested against were within Europe and the USA with
a few farther afield all returned the same.
I have within the last 2 hours connected via http to the ASNET-AM
(Academic Scientific Research Computer Network of Armenia) which now
shows the correct file.  Hopefully should now start to reflect with
other mirrors in due course.


As an example of what we were seeing go
to http://mirrors.200p-sf.sonic.net/scientific/7.2/x86_64/updates/security/.  
You will see the below.
pciutils-libs-3.5.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm            11-Nov-2008 12:45
147K


Now go
to http://mirrors.200p-sf.sonic.net/scientific/7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/.
 You will see the below.
p11-kit-trust-0.20.7-3.el7.x86_64.rpm        12-Nov-2008 08:43       14M
<——— Notice the file size here
pangomm-doc-2.34.0-3.el7.noarch.rpm     12-Nov-2008 08:43       203K




Now compare this to ASNET-AM (Academic Scientific Research Computer
Network of Armenia) http mirror at
http://mirrors.asnet.am/scientific/7x/x86_64/updates/security/.  You
will see the below.
pciutils-libs-3.5.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm             2016-11-11 21:03
 45K


And finally http://mirrors.asnet.am/scientific/7x/x86_64/os/Packages/.
 You will see the below.
p11-kit-trust-0.20.7-3.el7.x86_64.rpm        2015-03-09 17:13
 125K
pangomm-doc-2.34.0-3.el7.noarch.rpm     2014-05-14 17:46        203K


Regards,


Victor.


From: Paul Myers <[email protected]>
Organization: QMUL
Reply-To: Paul Myers <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 12 January 2017 at 12:39
To: Victor Walsh <[email protected]>
Subject: [Fwd: Re: repos for latest updates in scientific linux are not
working]






-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Stephan Wiesand <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: repos for latest updates in scientific linux are not
working
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 11:41:53 +0100


Hi,

> On 12 Jan 2017, at 11:14, Paul Myers <[email protected]> wrote:> > Hi > > 
> Can you help with this? > > The rpm's in the latest repos (this week's 
> updates) seem to be corrupt, We have tested other mirrors containing these 
> rpm's also which also seems to have the same issue we are still investigating 
> but these are causing failures when when run kickstart downloads > > 
> 7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/pangomm-devel-2.34.0-3.el7.x86_64.rpm 
> 7.2/x86_64/os/Packages/p11-kit-trust-0.20.7-3.el7.x86_64.rpm 
> 7.2/x86_64/updates/security/pciutils-libs-3.5.1-1.el7.x86_64.rpm > There also 
> appears to be a corrupt file in the 7.3 repo, although I have not tested this 
> as yet. 7.3/x86_64/os/Packages/pangomm-doc-2.34.0-3.el7.noarch.rpm > All 
> files for 7.2 are the incorrect size and are dated November 2008.  The file 
> for 7.3 is dated May 2014.  This affects syncs via rsync.  We have tested 
> against most repos and have got the same result.

that's strange. On our (rsync) mirror, the 7.2/7.3 files in all cases you 
mention are actually hardlinked and thus identical. They verify just fine too.

        Stephan

>  The http repos appear not to be affected. We are going to grab the rpm's 
> from Centos libraries which are looking ok> > Thanks> Paul Myers 

-- 
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany



Reply via email to