________________________________
FKonstantin said:
...

| For me, the issues are not policital, but technical:

Agreed. One of mine is that the surety of being able to drop a lower runlevel 
and back up is gone. I have always managed my systems the way I learned in the 
early days (probably from SunOS) where level 2 was multi-user no NFS, level 3 
added NFS (and possibly more), and level 5 was a GUI.
Sometimes it is very handy​ to be able to go down one or more levels to make 
changes or solve problems, then come back up. And it's much faster than 
rebooting beefy modern servers with their extensive hardware checks (or even 
Fedora on an older home computer).
For whatever faults it had, SysVInit handled this as well for me over the years 
as whatever had been in BSD. systemd does not- at least within Fedora and RHEL 
and its rebuilds.

-Miles

Reply via email to