Quoting:
Many open source and commercial cloning tools will do a *much* faster
and more efficient duplicate. End excerpt.
I assume faster and efficient is by comparison to a drive cloning device
with two slots, one for the source, and the other target (clone). If
so, which cloning tools do you recommend, either licensed for free or
for fee? Do these run on a single drive system, cloning the internal
single drive to an external USB raw device (e.g., /dev/foo but not
mounted)? A long time ago I would use dd from the drive to be cloned to
the target, both appearing as /dev but neither mounted (so that the
images would be "static" and fixed).
As for the "hilarity", I have done this -- carefully -- pre-UUID when
the external clone would appear as /dev/blah /dev/blah1 /dev/blah2 with
/dev/blah"i" being the i-th partition and /dev/blah the entire drive
including any hard-boot sectors or likewise "reserved" (visible under
gparted or the text terminal equivalent). Say /dev/blah1 was /usr, the
mount for /dev/blah1 to avoid hilarity might be /dev/usbblah1 , and the
like.
On 5/11/21 9:39 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:01 PM Yasha Karant <ykar...@gmail.com> wrote:
I want to reduce the booting time interval and other disc access time
interval. I have a 2 TByte SSD drive that has the same physical form
factor as 2 Tbyte rotating media hard drive. I also have a device that
will accept each drive and make a "bit by bit" copy from the source to
target drive.
Never assume that this will work, because hard drive manufacturers
cannot count. i.e, whether a "2 TB drive" is actually 2^41 bits in
size depends on how much space is being used for error correction, bad
sectors, and the like. Many open source and commercial cloning tools
will do a *much* faster and more efficient duplicate.
The current drive is the conventional harddrive. May I clone the
harddrive onto the bare SSD drive and then install, or will the machine
fail to boot/run because of UUID descriptors? Will these clone or not?
Most of the file systems in each partition are Linux XFS.
As long as /etc/fstab sees matching UUID's or even filesystem labels,
you should be OK in that sense. It's when you mount them both
physically on the same hardware at the same time that hilarity can and
will ensue.
