On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Johan Mares wrote:

> Connie Sieh wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Johan Mares wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>     
> >>> On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Johan Mares wrote:
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> Is Xen included in SL5 ? If so, also with a maximum of 4 virtual servers 
> >>>> ?
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> Yes. No. It is included, and it works, and there's no such limit (not 
> >>> even 
> >>> in the upstream product - at least it's not a technical limitation).
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> I read somewhere that the Xen version included with RHEL5 is limited to 
> >> 4 virtual servers (license). Maybe you have to pay to get more.
> >>     
> >
> > Yes RHEL5 has differnt prices from RedHat for different levels of 
> > virtualization.
> >
> > -Connie Sieh
> >   
> 
> Will this be different for SL5 or will it follow RHEL5 ?

SL5 will not have a limitation except for hardware and other technical 
limits.

-Connie Sieh

> 
> Johan
> 
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> Does anyone have any experience with Xen ? How does it compare to VMWare 
> >>>> (the
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> It's quite different. And there are two modes of operation (para/full 
> >>> virtualization) which are quite different again. Just give it a try and 
> >>> find out.
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> free edition) ? Any good manuals on how to get started with Xen ?
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> Why not try the Virtualization Guide coming with SL5 ;-)
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >>>> Tried it with Fedora C6 but either it tried to install itself onto the 
> >>>> install
> >>>> medium (my dvd player) (installing SL4, Debian, Ubuntu) or it disappeared
> >>>> (Centos5) after installing.
> >>>>     
> >>>>         
> >>> Read the document named above. Learn about virt-install, virt-manager, 
> >>> and 
> >>> the xm command (at least "xm list" and "xm create"). That should be all 
> >>> you need to get started.
> >>>
> >>> Hth,
> >>>
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> Thanx for the reply.
> >>
> >> Johan
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to