I will limit my question to two products then, namely Xensource's and VMWare's products.
Anyone ?

Johan

VLIZ
Flanders Marine Institute

Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Johan,
XenExpress, XenServer, and XenEnterprise are all products of XenSource, not RedHat.
They are all "added value" that XenSource adds to Xen.

RedHat starts with Xen and add's their own "added value". Their limitation of 4 concurrent VM's is a support limitation. Basically their way of saying "If you do this, and it breaks, don't come runing to us." BUT ... there is a hardware limitation that I've been seeing. Basically if I try to run too many virtual machines on a machine without enough memory, at some point I get a "Hay ... you don't have enough memory to squeeze in another virtual machine" message. It doesn't really say that, but that is what it means.

So back to your questions. I'm not going to answer them, but I am going to point out that you really are asking to compare 3 different products, not two.

You want to see the comparison between XenSource's products, VMWare's products, and RedHat's Virtual Products.

Troy

Johan Mares wrote:
I've posted previously about Xen. But know I have some more specific questions.

In RHEL5 Xen is limited to 4 concurrent VMs, which could mean that RHEL5 ships with Xen Express (the free starter package). In one of the replies on my previous post it was mentioned that there were no such restrictions on the number of concurrent VMs in SL5. Can someone give an explanation for the difference in concurrent VMs for Xen in SL5 versus RHEL5 ?

Without having to rtfm, what is Xen 3.0 in comparison to XenExpress (free version), XenServer (only Windows) and XenEnterprise (windows and linux) ? Is Xen 3.0 the basis on which the other 3 are build and then you just pay for the comfort of someone else having done it for you, some management tools and the support ?

Can someone compare Xen (free & commercial) with VMware Infrastructure (starter to enterprise) ? When to use what ? Difference in features. Because VMWare Infrastructure , especially the enterprise, has a serious price tag.

We would use virtualization for webservers, files and mysql-database servers, grid-computing, ease of setting up test and development servers.

thanx,

Johan



Reply via email to