> More fresh m4 may be helpful:
>
> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5x/SRPMS/SL/m4-1.4.8-1.src.rpm
Why, thank you! But say, isn't this *highly* abnormal to have an older binary
(m4-1.4.5-3.el5.1.i386.rpm) and a newer source (m4-1.4.8-1.src.rpm)?!
I understand that you can't provide a newer package unless TUV does exactly the
same, but hey... SOURCE? Is this SL or is it FreeBSD?
I'll try it though, it's my home PC anyway.
R-C
Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to
Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com
