On Fri, 13 Jul 2007, Michael Hannon wrote:
Hi, folks. I notice that the RPM's for gsl and gsl-devel no longer seem
to be included in SL 5.0.
I.e., on a system running SL 4.4 the "Vendor" for the gsl packages is
"Scientific Linux", but on a 5.0 system the "Vendor" is "ATrpms.net".
See the appended.
I'm perfectly happy to use Axel's repository, but I wonder: why the
change? It introduces a slight non-uniformity into one of our procedures.
TUV decided to not include gsl.
Is the issue of "non-uniformity" because some of your programs come
from ATrpms.net and some from SL ?
Since gsl is clearly related to "science" we will research the inclusion
of it in the next SL5.
-connie
Thanks.
- Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qi gsl
Name : gsl Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.5 Vendor: Scientific Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qi gsl-devel
Name : gsl-devel Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.5 Vendor: Scientific Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qi gsl
Name : gsl Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.8 Vendor: ATrpms.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qi gsl-devel
Name : gsl-devel Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 1.8 Vendor: ATrpms.net
