In the distant past, I used to add several ACCEPT rules for afs in ipchains or iptables when using openafs clients. But somewhere in time I stopped doing this (not conciously -- it just slipped my mind when making my checklist at some point), yet I've never noticed a problem while using the default iptables rules that end with a default REJECT in my SL installations. I've gotten a couple bits of different advice from individuals and the web (for instance: http://help.unc.edu/?id=5513 ) indicating that I need firewall rules in place, but they don't all seem to quite match up and I'm not familiar enough with afs and/or kerberos communications to know what's really necessary.

So, first the short question: should I be adding firewall rules when using SL 3/4/5 with the SL openafs-client packages?

If yes, then a medium (?) question: what rules should I add? Long (?) question: How can I demonstrate a failure if I don't have the firewall rules in place? A related question -- why haven't I noticed a problem before?

-Wayne

Reply via email to