We get all our updates from:
rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security
Viz:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home $ rsync
rsync://rsync.scientificlinux.org/scientific/50/x86_64/updates/security/
| grep openssl
-rw-r--r-- 1462393 2007/10/18 22:41:53 openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i686.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1477608 2007/10/22 21:18:52
openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1932138 2007/10/18 22:41:53
openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.i386.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1946437 2007/10/22 21:18:52
openssl-devel-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 32527 2007/10/22 21:18:52
openssl-perl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.2.x86_64.rpm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] home $
Yours
Faye
Troy Dawson wrote:
Faye Gibbins wrote:
More repo problems on x86_64
when trying to install openssl-devel our SL5.0 boxes insists on asking
for an install of 'openssl = 0.9.8b-8.3.2' despite openssl release
8.3.el5.2 being installed.
Should the openssl rpm have a release number "8.3.2" rather than
"8.3.el5.2"?
Yours
Faye
Hi Faye,
By definition (not by reality) openssl 8.3.2 is *newer* than 8.3.el5.2.
It was a compile time mistake we made by not having %dist set. (Long
story)
But I could have sworn that I removed all the 8.3.2 rpm's.
Where is it trying to get it from? I need to clean it up.
Thanks
Troy
--
---------------------------------------------------------
Faye Gibbins, Computing Officer (Infrastructure Services)
GeoS KB; Linux, Unix, Security and Networks.
Beekeeper - The Apiary Project, KB - www.bees.ed.ac.uk
---------------------------------------------------------
I grabbed at spannungsbogen before I knew I wanted it.
The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body,
registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.
