Thanks, sorry for the noise...
Confused :)
Robert
Connie Sieh wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jun 2008, Robert Burch wrote:
Dear All,
Are the md5sum's for SL 5.2 x86_64 iso's OK?
I pulled down SL 52 x86_64 iso's (Tue Jun 24 13:02:36 CDT 2008) from:
ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/52/iso/x86_64/
Ran my md5sum against them, but they did not match.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] md5sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
937abd48c9a56fb41339a9ab50f53ab6 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
These are sha1sum's not md5sum.
TUV switched from md5sum to sha1sum on RHEL 5.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] x86_64]# sha1sum SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cat SL.52.061808.x86_64.SHA1SUM
079dd3540db6f9b9b21f06883a8ad89e20231680 SL.52.061808.x86_64.disc1.iso
...
Or am I confused?
Thanks,
Robert Burch Jr
Cyclotron Institute, Texas A&M University
PS Great job on SL and this list!!
-Connie Sieh
