Robert E. Blair wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I have a x86_64 install of 5.1 and on it I have installed a version of
openoffice from openoffice.org and don't have any pieces of openoffice
from the 5.1 distribution. This morning it wanted to "update" my
openoffice 2.4.1 with the distribution 2.3 version. I put an exclude in
sl-security.repo and sl.repo to tell it not to, but does anyone know why
it would want to do this? The standard openoffice.org release is rpm
based so it should know better.
- --
Robert E. Blair, Room E277, Building 362
The openoffice in Scientific Linux has an epoch of 1, which that from
openoffice.org has an epoch of 0.
yum list openoffice\*
That 1: at the beginning of our openoffice version is the epoch number.
I don't know why redhat put a 1 on it, but they did.
Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] (630)840-6468
Fermilab ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI DSS Group
__________________________________________________
