On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Dusan Jiricny wrote:
Hello Valerij,
the missing packages were the catch. Thank you.
Regards,
Dusan
2008/12/12 Valery Mitsyn <[email protected]>:
Hi,
did you install a few additional evolution28 rpms, in particular
evolution28-glib2-2.12.3-6.el4.i386?
On my x86_64 SL4.7 with firefox-3.0.4.i386 where are follow
evolution28 rpms:
evolution28-cairo-1.2.4-6.el4.i386
evolution28-glib2-2.12.3-6.el4.i386
evolution28-gtk2-2.10.4-22.el4.i386
evolution28-pango-1.14.9-7.el4.i386
<snip>
But is it right that firefox is ending up depending on evolution?
btw not directly related but... I note that machines we installed with
sl52 have pulled in evolution even though we don't explicitly specify it
in the set of packages, those which were running sl51 (or sl50) and
upgraded to sl52 still don't have evolution and firefox works fine so the
sl5 version of firefox doesn't depend on anything from evolution...
I assume that evolution got added to a group that we include so I now
ought to decide if we should add evolution to the older boxes or remove it
from the newer ones (if we want to keep the desktop systems consistent...)
-- Jon
