Takashi Ichihara wrote:
David Nitz wrote
Hi,
I did (or tried to do) a yum-update upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3.
The files in /etc/yum.repos.d/ point to the 5.3 repositories,
but /etc/issue still says SL 5.2. Yumex does not show any
available updates.
Is the wrong /etc/issue an oversight in
the upgrade, or does it indicate a problem?
Hi
We have been successfully updated from SL5.0 to SL5.1 and from
SL5.1 to SL5.2 (both i386 and x86_64) so far, by
1) Changing /etc/yum.repos.d/files point to the 5.0 -> 5.1 (or 5.1-> 5.2)
2) yum update yum
3) yum clean all
4) yum update
(This method seems to be not supported officially. So please try at your
own risk)
Over a period of months, or all in a rush just now? Going directly from
5.0 to 5.3 should work, and a lot more quickly.
However, from SL5.2 to SL5.3, yum update method as mentioned above
for several nodes (in which packages are not fully installed) succeeded .
But on the several nodes (full-installed node) this method failed with the
conflicts relating to the Perl modules.
(From SL5.2 to SL5.3)
yum update :
Transaction Summary
================================================================================
Install 14 Package(s) Update 422 Package(s)
Remove 1 Package(s) Total download size: 1.2 G
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/List/Util.pm from install of
perl-5.8.8-18.el5 conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-10.el5_2.3
I agree with Valery, it's likely to be packages of different architectures.
Here's how to check:
rpm -q perl
Probably it will be listed twice.
Another check:
20:55 [sum...@bobtail ~]$ rpm -qa perl\* --qf '%{name} %{arch}\n'
perl x86_64
perl-BSD-Resource x86_64
and so on.
I don't know the proper resolution to this, but Troy and Connie will
probably tell us.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[email protected] [email protected]
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375
You cannot reply off-list:-)