Would it be possible to check the logs from the servers serving the RPMs to
see where the majority of the traffic is going to (onsite or off site), and
make a decision based on that? Or perhaps have it as an install option
(Update page: Option 1: Update from source repository? Option 2: Update from
mirrors?).

-brandon

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Troy Dawson <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> I'll answer the qestion inline
>
> Martin Jürgens wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> sadly I was not able to use the bug tracker so I will use this list to
>> address the issues / questions that I have in mind after using
>> Scientific Linux for some time.
>>
>> The first thing I noticed is that there is something wrong with the
>> sl-debuginfo repository. yum repolist says the following:
>>
>> sl-debuginfo         Scientific Linux 5 debuginfo rpm's       enabled :
>> 72
>>
>> But having looked at
>> ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5x/archive/debuginfo/
>> there seem to be much more packages in that repo than 72. Is there
>> something
>> wrong with the repodata?
>>
>>
> That is an oversight.  I'll fix the script and tomorrow when tomorrows
> errata go out, it should be fixed.
>
>  The second thing is that both gpgcheck and the
>> usage of mirrors is deactivated by default in yum.repos.d. I'd be
>> interested
>> in knowing why that is, also because the gpgcheck can vastly improve
>> security.
>>
>>
> gpgcheck
> I would love to turn that on.  The problem is that we still cannot sign
> jdk.  Well, we've gotten it down to we cannot sign the x86_64 version. So
> we're getting close, and as soon as we can, we will.
>
> Using mirrors vs mirrorlist
> Last time I checked, people still preferred having a static over using the
> mirrorlist.  Majority of our users have a local mirror, and so change that
> anyway.  As for the rest, we haven't asked for a year or two.  Last time we
> asked, I believe the problem people had was not knowing if the mirror they
> were getting was being updated fast enough. And at that time, I think
> fastestmirror wasn't as good as it is nowdays.
> But we could certainly ask again.
>
> What do people think, should we switch to using the mirrorlist as the
> default?  Or should we stick with how we currently have things?
>
> Troy
> --
> __________________________________________________
> Troy Dawson  [email protected]  (630)840-6468
> Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LCSI/CSI LMSS Group
> __________________________________________________
>



-- 
Brandon Galbraith
Mobile: 630.400.6992
FNAL: 630.840.2141

Reply via email to