John Summerfield wrote: > The major (only?) supporter of reiserfs in enterprise linux, SUSE, now > prefers ext3 (and presumably ext4 in the future), so I suggest you wean > yourself off reiserfs if/when you can. Hans was pushing/promoting > reiserfs4 and not interested in 3 any more, and now he's in the tender > care of the US govt I don't think anyone's betting the bank on either > version of reiserfs for the future.
thanks for info. hate to hear hans is on a federal vacation. tho better than a state or local. i was following his case for a while, but ended up losing track. a great mind is now lost. i have heard a lot of pros and cons about ext3/4 vs reiserfs3/4, but i have preferred reiserfs due to it using actual file size and not by block size. i guess i can get used to ext fs for systems, but i will hold off until i have to make change. actually hoping someone will pick up reiserfs and bring it to a practical point. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look* at it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/ 'LDP HOWTO-index' http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/ ****
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
