In keeping with a voting technique I've used before I'll name three
I like and three I don't.
Like: 1, 8b, and 16
Dislike: 4, 9, and 12
Thanks for continuing to solicit opinions,
Clint
--
Clint Bowman INTERNET: [email protected]
Air Quality Modeler INTERNET: [email protected]
Department of Ecology VOICE: (360) 407-6815
PO Box 47600 FAX: (360) 407-7534
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to thank everyone who has presented a logo or given their opinion
about what logo is best, or what makes a good logo.
I am going to officially say that we cannot accept any more logo's, even if
they are good. At some point we have to actually pick the logo, and that
gets hard when new logo's keep coming in.
As we said on the original rules, the judging will not be by the general
Scientific Linux community, but by "main developers and labs who have
a vested interest in Scientific Linux."
That being said, we are interested in everyone's opinion's, and I don't see
anything wrong with sending those opinions to the mailling list.
**Schedule:
*October 21 (evening) - Narrow down logo's based on scalability and the
ability to be recognized across a large room (such as a conference)
*October 23 (evening) - Narrow down logo's based on scientific theme
*October 29 - around Noon California time - Announce the winner at Hepix
during the "Scientific Linux Status Report and Plenary Discussion"
**Links:
http: //www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/graphics/logo.contest/index_html
http: //indico.cern.ch/conferenceTimeTable.py?confId=61917
Thanks
Troy Dawson
