On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:49:15AM -0600, Troy Dawson wrote: > Looks like we didn't get enough testing done, and maybe rrdtool doesn't > really need to be in the plain SL release. > Like Steve, I think that's probably the best approach. If there is a concrete reason for including directly it in SL though, it might suffice to use a 1.2 version that's compatible with the EPEL release.
> p.s. Just so you know, we didn't test it with every EPEL package. When > I said that "these packages are compatible with both epel and dag" I was > meaning the rrdtool package. It was packaged in the EPEL fashion and > naming convention, with provides statements so that it worked and > updated corrected with the dag repository. > I think that's a perfectly reasonable approach; all I meant by referring to that was that this problem interoperating with EPEL was most likely something that simply hadn't been spotted, and not something you didn't care about. Ewan
pgpHmhFlJCWSA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
