On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Troy Dawson <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, first problem. > This requires wxGTK, which is not in Scientific Linux. > Is that an important part? Can it be removed as a dependancy? > Do we want to also put that into SL?
Doh, I never thought to check that it actually built on SL without EPEL. Will get back to you. > > Troy > > Troy J Dawson wrote: >> >> Hi Steve, >> Sorry for not getting back to this. >> I think it looks ok. I am goign to put it into contrib first. >> For SL5 I think we can get it into the full release. >> For SL4, I'd rather not. I'd rather leave it in the contrib area. >> SL4 at *some* point is going to go into legacy mode, and I'd like to keep >> the added packages down. >> >> Troy >> >> Steve Traylen wrote: >>> >>> any comment? >>> >>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Steve Traylen <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've users who wish to have gnuplot42 on SL5 (and4) >>>> >>>> These are some packages here I've done: >>>> >>>> http://cern.ch/straylen/rpms/gnuplot42/ >>>> >>>> which are designed to not interfere with the existing gnuplot packages >>>> present in SL4/5. >>>> >>>> I do have an open review here for EPEL: >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570318 >>>> >>>> but due to lack of interest I guess it is not progressing. >>>> If it does progress I'll bump to higher release version in EPEL >>>> than in SL and advise SL of its redundancy in SL. >>>> >>>> Please consider gnuplot42 inclusion into SL. >>>> >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Steve Traylen >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > -- > __________________________________________________ > Troy Dawson [email protected] (630)840-6468 > Fermilab ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group > __________________________________________________ > -- Steve Traylen
