I'm a smidge confused by something. I am looking at the timestamps on a couple of the SRPMS and something seems to be amiss.

In ftp://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/5x/SRPMS/vendor are these files:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 568054 Nov 15  2007 pcre-6.6-2.el5.1.0.1.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 570887 Mar 27  2009 pcre-6.6-2.el5_1.7.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 567559 Nov 13  2007 pcre-6.6-2.el5.1.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 570836 Nov 29  2007 pcre-6.6-2.el5.7.src.rpm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 568035 Nov 15  2007 pcre-6.6-2.sl5.1.src.rpm
it seems to be that the file el5_1 is newer than el5.7 but I wanted to see if anyone had any opinions on it since the RPMS reflect a different story.
Release     : 2.el5.1.0.1                   Build Date: Thu 15 Nov 2007 02:57:05 PM GMT
Release     : 2.el5_1.7                     Build Date: Mon 26 Nov 2007 11:49:29 AM GMT
Release     : 2.el5.1                       Build Date: Tue 13 Nov 2007 05:20:59 PM GMT
Release     : 2.el5.7                       Build Date: Thu 29 Nov 2007 07:13:57 PM GMT
Release     : 2.sl5.1                       Build Date: Thu 15 Nov 2007 02:45:30 PM GMT
Which seems to indicate that el5.7 is the newest package.

Does anyone have any opinions on this? I'm going to try to rebuild this one package for myself but I'd like to do it with the right sources.

P.S. For those interested, here's what I'm trying to address:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457064
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3252
http://chrisjean.com/2009/01/31/unicode-support-on-centos-52-with-php-and-pcre/

Long story short, it's trivial to fix, but RedHat prefers to leave it open in its RHEL product. CentOS folks get it copied from RHEL (and also don't fix it), and RackTables is not the first application to be impacted by this bug.

A way to work around that would be to revert a part of the recent switch to uniform PCRE, namely, to employ mb_ereg() for character class matching again. For me this looks to be only a temporary measure (given, that ereg() is already deprecated) and adds undesired maintenance overhead.

This is where you can help. I am looking for a RHEL user with a support contract, which they could use to push RedHat's bug 457064 to be properly fixed (and working RPM put into updates). Technically it is a very simple work, but if we could make it done, that would help a lot.

-- 
  << MCT >>   Michael C Tiernan.   xmpp:[email protected]
  MIT - Laboratory for Nuclear Science - http://www.lns.mit.edu
  High Perf Research Computing Facility at The Bates Linear Accelerator
  "Bit-smashing your bits better than anyone can!"



Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to