Markus Neteler wrote:
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 11:16, Markus Neteler <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,

I have updated from the previous to the current 5.x SL version following
this procedure

https://www.scientificlinux.org/documentation/howto/upgrade.5x
-> "For those a little more cautious"

I have made another test, and found (at least) 650 packages not being updated:

rpm -qa --queryformat '%{NAME} was installed on %{INSTALLTIME:date}\n'
| grep ' 2008 ' | wc -l
650

rpm -qa --queryformat '%{NAME} was installed on %{INSTALLTIME:date}\n'
| grep ' 2008 ' | head -2
sed was installed on Fri 22 Aug 2008 04:04:50 PM CEST
libXfont was installed on Fri 22 Aug 2008 04:04:51 PM CEST

In Summer 2008 we installed the machine... how to enforce the full upgrade to
SL5.5?

I also tried to update again:

yum update
Loaded plugins: kernel-module
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/55/x86_64/SL/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno 12] Timeout: <urlopen error timed out>
Trying other mirror.
sl-base
                | 2.1 kB     00:00
sl-base/primary_db
                | 2.0 MB     00:02
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/55/x86_64/updates/security/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno 12] Timeout: <urlopen error timed out>
Trying other mirror.
sl-security
                | 1.9 kB     00:00
sl-security/primary_db
                | 309 kB     00:00
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update


thanks
Markus

Hi Markus,
I'm a little concerned about the URL timeout.  I'll look into that.

As for the update not updating every single package, I think you are a little confused about the differences between minor releases. When you go between minor releases (5.4-> 5.5) what you are getting is all the security and bugfixes that came out when the newer minor release came out. So if a package didn't have a bugfix or a security update, then that package does not get updated. There are plenty of packages that do not get any bugfix's our security updates. We even have a couple of rpm's that haven't changed between major releases (SL_rpm_show_arch, SL_password_for_singleuser ... etc)

In short, looking at the install date to see if a package needs to be updated, isn't the correct way.

Troy
--
__________________________________________________
Troy Dawson  [email protected]  (630)840-6468
Fermilab  ComputingDivision/LSCS/CSI/USS Group
__________________________________________________

Reply via email to