On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:37 AM, Matthew Willsher <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I've been looking through the fastbugs and errata repos and have notice some > discrepancies with TUV. For example, RHBA-2010:0857. In TUV this is a bug in > the main EL 6 channel. In SL it's in fastbugs. > Also in fastbugs is RHBA-2011:0339. In TUV EL this is in FasTrack. > Again, in fastbugs is RHEA-2010:0932. In TUV this is an enhancement in the > main channel. > > This concerns me a little as this seems to mean that SL fastbugs contains > legitimate, production ready bug fixes along with TUVs FasTrack bugs which > are more fixes if you experience a problem type updates that normal wouldn't > be wanted on production systems. Am I understand this correctly?
A similar question was asked on this mailing list and Troy gave a detailed answer : http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1103&L=scientific-linux-users&T=0&P=7222 Akemi
