I'm also worried that this means more effort in determining when something is a bugfix (so push out quickly) vs major changes so test with websites etc...
-- James Pulver Information Technology Area Supervisor LEPP Computer Group Cornell University -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Misc Things Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 10:11 AM To: Dr Andrew C Aitchison Cc: Phong Nguyen; [email protected] Subject: Re: {off topic} Firefox 5 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Dr Andrew C Aitchison <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, Phong Nguyen wrote: <skip> > I see a substantial upswing in corporate use of Opera > (konqueror too ?). > > -- > Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge > [email protected] http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna True. And "Release" is usually perceived and understood as a version of software with significant changes from the previous version. The new schedule based approach is fine, but they should not be calling it "releases". It's rather a regular builds that address bugs and add some new features. I'm not sure i understand the "marketing" behind this approach.
