On 19 July 2011 10:09, Bernhard Linseisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> For an extensive answer you probably should ask the people at CERN IT > directly, but so far I can tell you: I assumed there would be a CERN representative on the list :) Thanks for the information. > > The question is more: Why would you need SLC6 instead of SL6? > > I don't know, that's why I was asking.....I suppose if it included by default a lot of scientific packages that I'd want to use it might save some time and effort (as opposed to having to find and install them on top of SL6). M
