have you tried to knock in this door -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495156 ?
i know it was filed in 2009, but if you are getting it then it maybe worth
trying to re-open the bug.
Sorry, i can't help you more.
Andrew

On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Advrk Aplmrkt <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 3 August 2011 16:38, Andrew Z <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Advrk Aplmrkt <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I managed to boot into the text installer (still can't get GUI because
> >> of this: http://scientificlinuxforum.org/index.php?showtopic=453) for
> >> SL 6.1, and went through every step till I specify "use entire disk"
> >> during install and start the installation process.
> >>
> >> At this point, I would see messages saying the installer is
> >> partitioning the hard disk, copying files, etc., then always the same
> >> error:
> >>
> >> "An error occurred mounting device /dev/sdb1 as /boot/efi: mount
> >> failed: (9, None). This is a fatal error and the install cannot
> >> continue."
> >>
> >> Here is a screen shot via my phone:
> >>
> >>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/0bd326143256204][IMG]http://thumbnails39.imagebam.com/14326/0bd326143256204.jpg
> >>
> >> I have tried to boot via USB the LiveCD, LiveMiniCD, and LiveDVD
> >> images, same result.
> >>
> >> Note: /dev/sda is my hard disk, and my USB drive is apparently mounted
> >> in /dev/sdb
> >>
> >> Does anyone know what this means and how I can resolve the issue?
> >> Thanks so much.
> >
> > Check what your log has. From memory its on the third or 4th console.
>
> I have uploaded screen captures of both 4th and 5th consoles:
>
> 4th console:
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/31f323143427738
>
> 5th console:
>
> http://www.imagebam.com/image/40b4fa143427758
>
> Looks like from the 4th console it says:
>
> "set SELinux context for mountpoint /boot/efi to
> system_u:object_r:boot_t:s0"
>
> Followed by the error:
>
> "FSError: mount failed: (9, None)"
>
> Does this information help diagnose the problem? I really hope to be
> able to install SL 6.1. Thanks.
>

Reply via email to