On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dag Wieers wrote:
RPMforge provides already the (beta) 64bit flash-plugin, so there's no
need to wait for it. In this case the 64bit is installed, so there is no
reason to install the 32bit. Unless you want to replace the 64bit by the
32bit.
Hmm. Unless I am using an out of date mirror RPMforge has
flash-plugin.x86_64 11.0.1.129-0.1.el6.rf rpmforge
whereas the adobe-linux-i386 repo has
flash-plugin.i386 11.0.1.152-release @adobe-linux-i386
(Build Date: Sat 24 Sep 2011 02:45:27 AM BST).
So, why would one replace a 64bit flash-plugin with a 32bit one ?
Not so much that I want to - rather that the 32 bit adobe repo was
already enabled from when the machine was running SL5 and I have
only now looked for the adobe-linux-x86_64 repo.
My real point was that the rpmforge plugin is presumably out of
date if the adobe repo has a newer plugin with a higher release number.
--
Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge
[email protected] http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna
