On 2011/10/20 08:10, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Thomas Bendler
<[email protected]> wrote:
Secure boot is simply a design mistake. Instead of giving everyone the
opportunity to upload own certificates to the certificate store (like
browsers do), they implemented a hard coded list of certificates so that
only a few systems benefit from secure boot (the general idea of secure boot
is fine). This is the problem, the root of trust is moved to the vendors
instead of the owner. Unfortunately a lot of commercial interests will most
likely push it to the market as it is, so the only hope will be to be able
to switch it off.
The only intelligent post in this totally OT thread...
By definition there have been no intelligent posts to this thread. It does not
belong here. That it was posted here indicates the utter lack of intelligence
(can't read and follow directions) of the people wheezing in and starting this
thread.
{o.o}
