We subscribe to this list because we are interested in Scientific Linux *per se*, and even a mention about Red Hat (from which it is derived) does not legitimize off topic rants. Please find your gratification in another forum where others wish to read your opinions.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Yasha Karant <[email protected]> wrote: > Although a number of comments on and off the SL list have opined that any > discussion of UEFI is off-limits to this list, below is a popular press > article concerning a view from Red Hat (the beloved TUV of this list) that > presumably is on-limits. Again -- is there a workaround were efforts to > prevent the MS version of UEFI fail? >
