On 01/23/2012 10:55 AM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote:
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:44:54AM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote:
... So forgive me if I sound a bit annoyed, but this nfs-utils
problem has been stuck in my side for a while now. ...

Pat, don't worry about it too much. You guys do a good job, and
one of these things will happen once in a while no matter what.

Looking back, the previous "stuck" problem was with unsigned
java packages, and even that got resolved eventually.

If I were to read any lessons from the nfs-utils snafu, they would be:
a) to make bum packages "go away quietly" with minimum disruption,
    work *with* the nightly yum updates, not against them.
b) remember to post announcements about package updates and
    retractions to sl-errata.



I fully agree with A and B as a good target. Our internal process aims for A and B but in the rush to get a fix, there was a botch. And in the rush to fix the fix so that the fix can be fixed by this new fix, things got a bit muddled (you don't want to see the flowchart I drew, its not pretty).

As always, I count myself lucky to be a part of the SL community, some mornings I just need my coffee before I start in on the email.

Apologies for the shortness of my earlier email - self += Caffeine; has done wonders for my mood.

Pat

--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer

Reply via email to