> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Yasha Karant <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=636628 > >
That bug report is no good as it is filed against Fedora. If you want to see the same bug fixed in RHEL/SL, you better file a bug against RHEL (with reference to the fedora bug). In the RHEL world, no bug report - no problem - no fix. P.S. And that's my personal experience. system-config-date has been busted since SL6.0. Original bug was reported in Fedora, *fixed* in Fedora for years, then shows up again in RHEL6. So I file a bug against RHEL6.0. First it is downgraded to low priority, (RHEL6.1 is out), then it is bumped into high priority (RHEL6.2 is about to go out), now the fix is scheduled for RHEL6.3. If you think it is too cumbersone and too difficult and too slow, please go ahead and roll out your own YaLinux or whatever. P.P.S. The quoted bug report includes a workaround for the problem (RTFBR!), so I vote to delete this whole email thread out of existance - problem is known, is reported through proper channels and there is a workaround. There is nothing to discuss other than whining about bugs not being fixed quickly enough or diverge into unrelated topics such as bios and grub password protections. -- Konstantin Olchanski Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow! Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada
