6.2 is in its final release.
Where are you still seeing 6.1 as the latest on the website? I forgot
to publish the 'news' update, but thought I'd gotten all the other
references.
The mirrors list has been notified of the release.
Pat
On 02/16/2012 09:43 AM, [email protected] wrote:
OK, so if I am specifically using a 6.1 repo, my host will stay where
it is then. Second question, is this the final release? The web site
and mirrors still have 6.1 listed, just want to confirm before I start
downloading.
Thanks
Jolynn
On Feb 16, 2012 10:01am, Pat Riehecky <[email protected]> wrote:
> 6.2 and 6x
>
>
>
> On 02/16/2012 08:56 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>
> What repo do the new RPM's show up in?
>
>
>
> On Feb 16, 2012 9:35am, Pat Riehecky [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On 02/15/2012 05:38 PM, Steven Haigh wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > On 16/02/2012 8:01 AM, Pat Riehecky wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Release Notes for Scientific Linux 6.2 February 15 2012
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > The full release notes are available at
>
> >
>
> > http://www.scientificlinux.org/distributions/6x/62/
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Excellent work guys!
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I would just like to confirm if my understanding on one matter is
correct... If a system follows the sl6x repos, will this automatically
update to 6.2 as the packages hit the mirrors?
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > I started life with SL at 6.1 - so I've never gone through the
minor version change with SL before.
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Correct, any system on the 6x repos should update on its own to 6.2
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > (one of my boxes did so last night, so I'm confident it is working
fine)
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > Pat
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> >
>
> > Pat Riehecky
>
> >
>
> > Scientific Linux Developer
>
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Pat Riehecky
>
> Scientific Linux Developer
>
>
>
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux Developer
