On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 02:35:19PM -0500, Pat Riehecky wrote: > On 04/27/2012 02:26 PM, Konstantin Olchanski wrote: > >It appears as if the latest SL 5 update uses a different naming convention, > >breaking with the old sequence 5.1, ..., 5.7, it identifies itself as "58". > > > >This broke my private script that looked for sl-release under the name > >sl-release-5.* > >(the actual name is "sl-release-58-4.sl.noarch", notice no "." between "5" > >and "8", > >compare to filenames of sl-release for all previous versions of SL4, 5, and > >6). > > > >After fixing this, I see that many external yum repositories stopped working > >because they assume the "5.8" name, not "58". > > > >So my inquiring mind wants to know if this change is permanent and SL 59, > >510, 511, > >63, 64, etc are to follow. > > > > > That was a typo, it should have been 5.8 >
A corrected package is coming out? -- Konstantin Olchanski Data Acquisition Systems: The Bytes Must Flow! Email: olchansk-at-triumf-dot-ca Snail mail: 4004 Wesbrook Mall, TRIUMF, Vancouver, B.C., V6T 2A3, Canada
