On 2012-10-23 15:17, Mark Stodola wrote:
> On 10/23/2012 12:02 AM, Olivier Mauras wrote: > >> On 2012-10-23 06:09, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Olivier Mauras wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, I'm trying to set in place a centralized patch management for my SL installations with pulp. After synchronizing a few repositories, i noted that pulp wasn't seeing any erratas in the repos. The actual issue is that SL repos don't provide any updateinfo.xml file. Any reason for that? Is that a desired state? Could it be possible to work this out - maybe recreating them from another source or such ? >>> The SL6rolling security updates directory now includes an updateinfo.xml file. I only noticed this recently, so guess that it is a new feature. >> Ah true... Any chance to see them in fixed version repos? > > There was a posting on the SL-devel mailing list earlier this month > regarding the updateinfo.xml and yum-security support being in "Alpha1". > It is still in testing and is not rolled out to any other > repositories. See the archives for more detailed info: > > http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1210&L=scientific-linux-devel&T=0&P=309 > > -Mark Thanks. Guess i'll try syncing a test server to the rolling repo and see how it's going.
