-- Sent from my HP Pre3
On Feb 8, 2013 11:12 AM, Stephan Wiesand <[email protected]> wrote:
On Feb 8, 2013, at 17:01 , Paul Robert Marino wrote:
> And just as an aside last I looked at systemd I didn't think it was fully baked yet. Many of the init scripts were ported in a haphazard rushed manner as a result they don't all work the way they really should. Also I question some of the logic for servers. Some of the capabilities of systemd are great for desktops but scary on a server. I go to great lengthens to ensure that if someone plugs something in to one of my boxes nothing happens and now here is a service control system built around the premise of doing exactly what I want to prevent.
> Further more the CLI is clunky and not the most functional or initiative set of commands for sysadmins who don't use X11.
I happen to like systemd. It feels a bit strange, but it's not bad at all. And with SL7, it's going to be upon us. If you have problems with it, file bugs against F18 *now* and against EL7 beta as soon as possible.
Well I'm not saying it doesn't have potential I just think its going to be a few years before it will lice up to its potential and there are going to be some serious growing pains in the mean time. And I've said so on the some of redhats discussion forums about RHEL 7. Also does any one use a new major x.0 release in anything mission critical I know I don't. I let it simmer for a year that's not to say I don't test on it but usually any x.0 release of rhel and sl has bugs and will need tuning.
Stephan
--
Stephan Wiesand
DESY -DV-
Platanenenallee 6
15738 Zeuthen, Germany
