On 07/03/2013 11:52 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote: > Yes, jumbo frames were enabled and the following networking tuning was > applied ;-) > > net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216 > net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216 > net.core.wmem_max = 16777216 > net.core.rmem_max = 16777216 > net.core.wmem_default = 65536 > net.core.rmem_default = 87380 > net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 30000 Thanks for info!
Adrian > > - Chris > ________________________________________ > From: Adrian Sevcenco [[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2013 2:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) > Subject: Re: KVM + NFS Performance (ZFS/BTRFS/EXT4) > > On 07/03/2013 09:23 PM, Brown, Chris (GE Healthcare) wrote: >> -- Test Config #8 -- >> Max Read: 652.4 >> Max Write: 670.4 > are you sure you used 9k frames in your network configuration? > I am very interested in your results and work (many thanks btw for > sharing) and i heard about better results with jumbo frames.. > > Thanks! > Adrian >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
