On 07/10/2013 04:22 PM, Don Pandori wrote:
Hi,
For some reason the repos don't have the version of javadoc that this
security errata entry shows.
http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1306&L=scientific-linux-errata&T=0&P=1587
SL6 x86_64 java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.x86_64.rpm i386
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.i686.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-debuginfo-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.i686.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.i686.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.i686.rpm
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.i686.rpm noarch
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.25-2.3.10.3.el6_4.noarch.rpm
Anyone know when the javadoc package will get updated?
I suppose the alternative is to remove it, but I don't want to. ;-)
Thanks,
Don
Hi Don,
Not too sure how that happened.....
I'm pushing the updated javadoc right now. It should take about 45 minutes.
Pat
--
Pat Riehecky
Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/
