> > Is SL not PCI compliant because it is not a commercial > effort? I thought SL got all the patches the RHEL > got? Please elucidate. > > There is no PCI requirement(s) to use commercial OS. Please read the requirements instead of FUD!
-- Eero
> > Is SL not PCI compliant because it is not a commercial > effort? I thought SL got all the patches the RHEL > got? Please elucidate. > > There is no PCI requirement(s) to use commercial OS. Please read the requirements instead of FUD!
-- Eero