On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <[email protected]> wrote: > > git repositories *can* be as easy to use as SRPM's, *if* they are > tagged, and *if* there is a way to obtain an index of the relevant > tags of a particular point release. So the risk isn't in using git: > it's in the lack, so far, of relevant tags to distinguish RHEL source > code from whatever CentOS may choose to modify, and the potential for > unknown changes between the RHEL internal git repositories and > whatever CentOS may choose to integrate and publish.
I would expect TUV (Red Hat) sources to be on one branch and all CentOS modifications on a different branch. This seems a minimal requirement for sanity. Are you saying this is not what they are doing? - Pat
