Indeed!

anything curious on ldd of rpm?

Pat

On 06/25/2014 09:11 AM, Werf, C.G. van der (Carel) wrote:
Hi Pat,

# ldd /lib64/libsepol.so.1
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003742400000)
        /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003742000000)

# rpm -Va
Segmentation fault

Ha, that's interesting ... it might be rpm after all ?


Carel





-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Riehecky [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: woensdag 25 juni 2014 16:03
To: Werf, C.G. van der (Carel); [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] yum segfaulting

I'm a bit curious what does

ldd /lib64/libsepol.so.1

report?

Also, you may want to try:

rpm -Va

That will take loads of time, but may report something interesting.

Pat

On 06/25/2014 07:44 AM, Werf, C.G. van der (Carel) wrote:
Running an strace still offers no clues to this problem...


When running:
# strace yum --help 2>&1 | cat > yum-tracelog


I see this at the end of the log.

open("/lib64/libsepol.so.1", O_RDONLY)  = 6 read(6,
"\177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0>\0\1\0\0\0\0=\300C7\0\0\0"...,
832) = 832 fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=247496, ...}) = 0
mmap(0x3743c00000, 2383136, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 6, 0) = 0x3743c00000 mprotect(0x3743c3b000,
2097152, PROT_NONE) = 0 mmap(0x3743e3b000, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 6, 0x3b000) = 0x3743e3b000 
mmap(0x3743e3c000, 40224, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, 
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x3743e3c000
close(6)                                = 0
--- SIGSEGV (Segmentation fault) @ 0 (0) ---
+++ killed by SIGSEGV +++
<<

So after closing /lib64/libsepol.so.1, the segfault is triggered.

But, since I disabled selinux, why is there a call to libsepol.so.1 ?


On a my mirror-server, the same call to # yum --help" does work without 
segfault.
An strace in this situation, will show that after closing the 
/lib64/libespol.so.1 the next commands are traced ...

mprotect(0x319a607000, 4096, PROT_READ) = 0
access("/etc/selinux/", F_OK)           = 0
open("/etc/selinux/config", O_RDONLY)   = 6
fstat(6, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=511, ...}) = 0 mmap(NULL,
4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2b9d45eb4000 read(6, "# This file controls the state o"..., 4096) = 511
read(6, "", 4096)                       = 0
close(6)
<

/etc/selinux/config is identical on both systems.


Anyone a clue ?

Regards,
Carel


-----Original Message-----
From: Zhi-Wei Lu [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: dinsdag 24 juni 2014 14:18
To: Werf, C.G. van der (Carel); '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: yum segfaulting

I had similar problem before, someone changed the stock system libz.so with a 
newer version libz.so, which yum didn't like it!

Zhi-Wei Lu
IET-CR-Network Operations Center
University of California, Davis
(530) 752-0155

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
Werf, C.G. van der (Carel)
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 12:23 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: yum segfaulting

Hi,

I have two identical SL 5.3 fileservers, who function as a DRBD-pair.
One of them was recently completely replaced with identical hardware, so I had to image 
the old one, and install OS-image on "new" server.

But now, when I run yum on the new server, it returns a segmentation fault 
(even a simple: # yum --help).

Googling this, a lot of pages hint for a memory error. But, running a memtest 
did not show any error.

So far, only yum returns the segmentation fault.

Does anyone have any clue for this ?

Regards,
Carel van der Werf

--
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/



--
Pat Riehecky

Scientific Linux developer
http://www.scientificlinux.org/

Reply via email to