On 8 July 2014 08:31, Konstantin Olchanski <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:19:58AM -0700, Jim McCarthy wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Connie Sieh wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I note that only X86-64 is available; have I missed something about
> > >> supported ISAs, or will there also be an IA-32 port/distribution as
> > >> well?
> > >>
> > >> Yasha Karant
> > >
> > > TUV is only releasing X86-64 .
> > >
> > > -Connie Sieh
> >
> > Is this for TUV "v7 ALPHA", or is this to become 'the new normal' going
> > forward ?
> >
>
> My best guess is - there is no 32-bit RHEL7 because "they" decided to use
> the XFS filesystem by default, but XFS only works on 64-bit systems
> (something about stack size or page size or something obscure like that).
>
> This is a wise decision if you consider that all serious UNIX machines
> went 64-bit back in the late-1990-ies (SGI, DEC, etc),
> and that all new PC hardware is 64-bit capable.
>
> This is a silly decision if you consider your pile of 32-bit-only
> Pentium-3 and -4 based VME SBCs
> that you use to run all the experiments data acquisition systems and much
> of the accelerator controls.
> (These 32-bit-only machines are here to stay and they cannot be upgraded
> to 64-bit CPU
> and they cannot be economically replaced by 64-bit-capable VME SBCs -
> requires major $$$ plus
> major man-hours for software updates and testing).
>
>
Well I would probably just run EL-6 on those boxes until the end of their
lives. There isn't going to be any improvement in baseline software for
those older architectures between EL-6 and EL-7 (and for Pentium 3's maybe
no difference between EL-5 and EL-6).


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.

Reply via email to