On Wed, 3 Sep 2014, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > It's quite galling: the current semi-manual re-assembly of > local branches, based on "git log" entries, is winding up > lauded as sufficient and superior because, frankly, it's the > only thing that's currently supported.
Nico I get it -- you are unhappy about unsigned SRPMS. I am located in the US and so readily subject of the reach the upstream as a target for litigation on perceived EULA / terms of use / etc violations. I won't be exposing such a tool publicly, but then ... If you (seemingly offshore from the upstream) really cannot afford the funds for a subscription, and will do the coding of a mrepo / satellite / whatever proxy to retrieve the signed sources, please ... pass the hat, buy a subscription, and just sit down and write the code. It would seem (but you should satisfy yourself) that your downside risk is that they will turn off such a subscription But is is not productive (for you) to carp over and over without taking steps to address your concern, nor (for others) reading mailing lists to wade through 're-runs' of your concern Thanks -- Russ herrold
