The glusterfs-server rpm has now been included in sl-addons for SL 6.x. This came out of a need to pull it into HELiOS for one of our internal product teams. It is generated via the small change to TUV's SPEC file to have the glusterfs-server package also built. For the time being Pat and I decided it best to place it into sl-addons for 6.6, and then consider moving it in to core for 6.7. regards, - Chris
Subject: Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] glusterfs Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 14:52:27 +0100 From: lejeczek <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> To: Peter van Hooft <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, Paul Robert Marino <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> CC: Pat Riehecky <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> On 10/12/13 15:14, Peter van Hooft wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:59:08AM -0500, Paul Robert Marino wrote: >> You have to download the RPM's from Glusters yum repos. >> They purposely removed it from EPEL because the Gluster 3.4 client is >> now included in RHEL and the server version which was in EPEL was too >> old to work with the client included with RHEL, >> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__download.gluster.org_pub_gluster_glusterfs_&d=AwMCaQ&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=k6oKZI9weMoc8LXiW22fgCr4b3qBxTlgzDRcLcUS7m4&m=l9ghOlGXJZFc5fqcqBquKoY512TE9SWS6ciWJX9qvu0&s=4j7cgoO4YLnoE0b73Fy3u53v-t34iWb5xoAxbEL2QAQ&e=> >> you have to pick the right repo for the version you want for example 3.4 is >> here >> http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.4/3.4.0/RHEL/epel-6/x86_64/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__download.gluster.org_pub_gluster_glusterfs_3.4_3.4.0_RHEL_epel-2D6_x86-5F64_&d=AwMCaQ&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=k6oKZI9weMoc8LXiW22fgCr4b3qBxTlgzDRcLcUS7m4&m=l9ghOlGXJZFc5fqcqBquKoY512TE9SWS6ciWJX9qvu0&s=4-_3hZpFnVzAi9E6ISLmD8OxzqvSeRWnA2VWw9DRxmE&e=> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Peter van Hooft >> <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 08:05:02AM -0600, Pat Riehecky wrote: >>>> On 12/10/2013 02:53 AM, Peter van Hooft wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> When updating my 6.4 system, glusterfs release 3.4.0.36rhs-1 was >>>>> available from sl-security. >>>>> However, since I had glusterfs-server 3.2.7-1 from EPEL installed, the >>>>> update failed since >>>>> glusterfs-server 3.4.0.36rhs-1 from SL6 is not available. >>>>> Does anyone have an idea when this package will be published? Do I have >>>>> to wait for SL6.5? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> Peter van Hooft >>>> I'm afraid the glusterfs-server package is not in SL 6. >>>> >>>> I've only got >>>> glusterfs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> glusterfs-api-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> glusterfs-api-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> glusterfs-devel-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> glusterfs-fuse-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> glusterfs-libs-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> glusterfs-rdma-3.4.0.36rhs-1.el6.x86_64.rpm >>>> >>>> The upstream announcement (BA-2013-1641) does not list the server >>>> package either. >>>> >>>> Pat >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Pat Riehecky >>>> >>>> Scientific Linux developer >>>> http://www.scientificlinux.org/<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.scientificlinux.org_&d=AwMCaQ&c=IV_clAzoPDE253xZdHuilRgztyh_RiV3wUrLrDQYWSI&r=k6oKZI9weMoc8LXiW22fgCr4b3qBxTlgzDRcLcUS7m4&m=l9ghOlGXJZFc5fqcqBquKoY512TE9SWS6ciWJX9qvu0&s=jnNe2DbaXRwyMR7XthnEFrA7DcSUVmy4qYpOtZardCM&e=> >>>> >>>> >>> I downloaded the source rpm and rebuilt it with --with server >>> The glusterfs-server package gets built nicely. >>> I couldn't find any references to why SL6 don't offer it though, except >>> for a discussion on EPEL if they would drop *their* glusterfs packages. >>> The SL6 glusterfs packages on the other hand (to be precise: the >>> glusterfs-api >>> package) are needed for other package upgrades. >>> >>> Peter > I believe RedHat doesn't offer glusterfs-server because they made that into a > layered product for their > storage appliance. But why can't SL offer it? > I'll discuss moving to the glusterfs.org repos with the team here. > Thanks all. > > Peter > and the story continues with rhel 7.x, right? still no plans?
