The Oscars are for the actors. Occasionally, they manage to make us peons happy 
with the choices.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:          My feelings were mixed. You can't say racism 
was rampant, because they gave one to Whitaker over O'Toole, the sentimental 
choice due to years of being an alsos-ran. In years past O'Toole's age and 
number of near-misses would have made him a shoe-in for the Oscar. Then they 
gave one to Jennifer Hudson, first-time actress, first-time nominee, and in a 
role with a lot of singing to boot. Again, in times past the "wisdom" would 
have been against her, with Academy voters taking that "she's new, let her get 
a few more pics under her belt" attitude. Eddie Murphy was the popular choice, 
but again, the Academy went against traditional wisdom. I'd already stated that 
I liked Murphy's performance, but wasn't sure it was Oscar worthy. I haven't 
seen "Little Miss Sunshine" yet. So they were good to people of color, moreso, 
if you count the Latino wins. And they seem to have been voting for talent over 
sentiment. That was indicative of quite a
 bit of progress.

Scorsese's win really pleased me. That was one case that *might* have been 
based on sentiment, but the movie was solid, so it's no disgrace. Remember, 
Denzel Washington has said that "Training Day" wasn't his best work, but he 
still felt he deserved the Oscar for it. I guess the same could be said of 
Scorsese, as "The Departed" is a fantastic movie. I haven't seen "The Queen" 
and the others, except for "Letters from Iwo Jima", a fantastic flick. I'm 
okay, though, with Marty taking the nod. The sentiment that Eastwood could sit 
this one out probably was there. From what I've heard, the "Babel" nods 
(another flick I haven't seen) puzzled many who think the movie sounds better 
than it plays. 

Overall the Academy has issues, but it seems to be it's taking baby steps in 
the right direction. Last night substance seemed to win out a bit over style 
and hype. What are the specifics of your problems with the awards? 

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: The Yokozuna Of Soul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
I have to say that I'm a little disappointed with the Academy and 
how/when they give Oscars now. Martin Scorsese has done a lot of 
great original work. Last night he won an Oscar for a remake that 
Brad Pitt co-produced. Doesn't seem right to me. It was nice taht 
the American Idol girl won an Oscar, that just shows what 
Myspace.com has been proving for years: the people are right and the 
suits are wrong. The Academy needs to look at it's voting body and 
ask itself why Will Farrell/John Reilly/Jack Black's number was more 
true than funny.

Just my thoughts today on this.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



         


"There is no reason Good can't triumph over Evil, if only angels will get 
organized along the lines of the Mafia." -Kurt Vonnegut, "A Man Without A 
Country"
 
---------------------------------
Want to start your own business? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to