Keith, I read this story just before I crashed last night, and was planning to 
post it here this morning. 

IMO, *any* drive of this sort should be tested/operated well beyond any 
planetary body, for maximum safety.





---------[ Received Mail Content ]----------

 Subject : [scifinoir2] Scientists Discuss Causes, Repercussions of Warp Drive

 Date : Sun, 14 Jun 2009 03:56:44 +0000 (UTC)

 From : Keith Johnson <keithbjohn...@comcast.net>

 To : scifinoir2@yahoogroups.com


Fascinating stuff, especially the whole thing about whether we live in a "1 +1 
= 2" or "1 + 1 = 3" universe. But something struck me as odd about this 
article: the subject doesn't fit the title. The title--which I admit caught my 
eye--is all about black holes swallowing Earth. The body of the article, 
however, is more about the Alcubierre drive, how it could work, and whether the 
method is even the right one for our dimension.The black hole danger is only 
one small, frankly insignificant, facet of the piece. 
Wow: sensationalist, attention-grabbing headlines even in advanced science? Now 
I know the Apocalypse is near! 

***************************************** 

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/06/11/warp-drive-engine-02.html 

June 11, 2009 -- "Star Trek" makes faster-than-light travel look easy, but 
according to new calculations by Italian physicists, a warp drive could easily 
create a black hole that would incinerate any passengers on a space craft and 
then suck Earth into a black hole . 


"Warp drives are so far the best case scenario to attain faster-than-light 
travel," said Stefano Finazzi of Italy's International School for Advanced 
Studies. This paper "makes it much harder to realize, if not almost impossible, 
warp drives." 

WATCH VIDEO: Explore the possibilities of time travel with Michio Kaku. 

In normal physics, nothing can move faster than the speed of light. Einstein's 
theory of relativity forbids it. In normal space any object approaching the 
speed of light will increase in mass exponentially, and require an exponential 
increase in the amount of power needed to propel it forward. 

There are two exceptions to this rule however. The first is what's commonly 
called a worm hole , a bridge connecting two different parts of space. A ship 
crossing this bridge would move at below light speed, but still arrive before a 
beam of light that would have had to go the long way around. Warp drives are 
the second and more appealing option. A ship can't move through space faster 
than the speed of light. But with enough energy, space itself can move faster 
than the speed of light. 

Known for the Mexican physicist Michael Alcubierre who originally developed the 
idea in the 1990's, an Alcubierre warp drive would create a bubble of energy 
behind the ship and a lack of energy in front of the ship, like a giant cosmic 
wave a space ship could surf . That particular section of space can travel 
faster than the speed of light in the surrounding space, and anything on or in 
that bubble will accelerate with it. 

Finazzi and his colleagues propose creating this bubble of space-time by using 
a massive amount of "exotic matter," or dark energy. (Exactly how this bubble 
would be created is still a mystery.) According to their calculations and 
simplified, it would take a huge amount of energy to create the bubble, and 
then increasing amounts of energy to contain the highly repulsive dark energy. 

Eventually the energy would run out. The bubble would rupture, with 
catastrophic effects. Inside the bubble the temperature would rise to about 
10^32 degrees Kelvin, destroying almost anything on the bubble. 

Anyone watching the ship nearby wouldn't be much better off. 

"We know that the warp drive will be destabilized," said Finazzi. "But we do 
not know if it will in the end explode or collapse to a black hole." 




Other physicists agree with the Italians' calculations, up to a point. 

"It's a good paper; their results are sound," said Gerald Cleaver, a professor 
of physics at Baylor University who reviewed the work. The results make sense, 
at least, when creating warp drive using exotic matter in a universe where 1 
plus 1 equals 2. 

In a universe where 1 plus 1 equals 3, a possibility with string theory instead 
of the semi classical physics used by the Italians, a stable warp drive is 
viable. 

Last year Cleaver and co-author Richard Obousy detailed a string theory-based 
warp drive that creates a bubble of space time by expanding one of the tiny, 
rolled-up dimensions (instead of a bubble of dark energy) predicted by string 
theory. 

The biggest sticking point to a extra dimension-based warp drive? The entire 
mass of Jupiter would have to be converted into pure energy to power it. 

The real question is not whether a warp drive, which by Cleaver's estimate is 
hundreds of years away, will be stable or not. It's about the fundamentals of 
the universe; do we live in a universe where 1 plus 1 equals 2 or 3? Until 
scientists can answer that question, there will be significant limitations on 
scientific models of the universe. 

"These papers suggest limitations to what we can and can't do," said Cleaver. 
"We as scientists enjoy these papers because then we can look for ways to get 
around those limitations." 


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQdwk8Yntds

Reply via email to