http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31965108/ns/technology_and_science-space/

What we didn’t know about the moonwalk

After 40 years, get the back story behind that ‘one small step’

By Jay Barbree
Correspondent
NBC News

Sun., July 19, 2009


CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - Neil Armstrong moved slowly down the ladder.
Getting to the moon had been a long time coming.  He was an Ohio pilot who
came from the same soil as Orville and Wilbur, who ejected from a crippled
jet fighter over Korea just after turning 21, who flew seven test flights
in the X-15 rocket, who saved himself and a crewmate in Gemini 8, who
ejected from a lunar landing trainer a split second before it crashed.

In the 1950s and '60s, he flew about every propeller, jet, rocket and
helicopter built by his country. To say that this Midwestern farmboy was
the best test pilot in an emergency ever was an easy argument. That’s why
chief astronaut Deke Slayton chose Neil Armstrong to take the first step
on a small world that had never been touched by life. A landscape where no
leaf had ever drifted, no insect had ever scurried, where no blade of
green ever waved, where in the silence of vacuum even the fury of a
thermonuclear blast would sound no louder than a falling snowflake.

More than 200,000 miles away, billions of eyes stared at the
black-and-white TV picture.  They watched Neil’s ghostly figure move like
a spacesuited phantom, closer and closer, planting his boots in moondust
at 10:56 p.m. ET, July 20, 1969.

All motion stopped. "That's one small step for a man," Neil said slowly,
"one giant leap for mankind."

Neil gathered several ounces of rock and soil from the lunar surface and
stuffed the invaluable material in a suit pocket. The plan was, after Buzz
Aldrin joined him, they would remain outside for two hours, planting
experiments and collecting primarily rocks, but if something should go
wrong, at least they would have a tiny bit of the moon.

With the contingency sample safely tucked away, he took the time to look
around.  “The moon has a very stark beauty all its own,” he said, almost
whispering.  “It’s like much of the high desert areas of the United
States. It’s different, but it’s pretty out here.”

What we on Earth did not know at the time was exactly why history’s first
moonwalk began when it did. NASA had scheduled a four-hour sleep and rest
period for Armstrong and Aldrin in the lunar module, or LM, and we were
told to wait.

It turned out that we were hoodwinked.

The truth came out last November. NBC News President Steve Capus was
giving me a dinner to celebrate my 50 years at the network. Former
astronauts Neil Armstrong, John Glenn and Edgar Mitchell flew in, along
with other survivors of the old days. Following dinner and a short ride to
one of our favorite watering holes, Neil spilled the beans.

“Of course we wanted to get outside as soon as possible, before an
emergency. But we thought we would need several hours to get the LM’s
fluids and systems settled,” he explained.

"For several hours you reporters would have been speculating, guessing
about possible problems, and we didn’t want one of you inventing stories,”
Neil grinned. “That’s why we put in a four-hour sleep and rest period we
hoped we would never use.”

We laughed, and Neil laughed, and he added, “Everything went much faster
than we expected.”

Most of us were having dinner when the call came that the moonwalk would
begin early. We rushed back to our microphones and reported the
history-making event of our lives.


Buzz takes his turn

While Neil took his one small step, Buzz Aldrin stayed aboard the lunar
module, which they named Eagle, to monitor its systems. That was his duty
as lunar module pilot, and that was one reason why he was the second man
to walk on the moon. When he and Mission Control were convinced that the
Eagle was safe and purring, he joined Neil on the surface.

“Beautiful, beautiful!  Magnificent desolation,” Buzz said as he stared at
a sky that was the darkest of blacks above a landscape that was many
shades of gray, a touch of brown, and utter black where the rocks cast
their shadows.  No real color, not even the places lit by the unfiltered
sun.

Then there was the weak gravity. They weighed only one-sixth of their
Earth poundage, and Neil reported, “The surface is fine and powdery.  It
adheres in fine layers, like powdered charcoal, to the soles and sides of
my boots.  I only go in a fraction of an inch, maybe an eighth of an inch,
but I can see the footprints of my boots and the treads in the fine, sandy
particles.”


Was the moonwalk faked? No!

It would be these highly defined footprints that would set some armchair
physicists crying the moonwalk was a fake. In the years to come there
would be those who would claim Apollo astronauts never went to the moon.
They said all of it was done on a movie set in an Arizona.

It occurred to me that if NASA had been so deviously smart to persuade
400,000 Apollo workers to lie, to persuade the Russians to lie, to
persuade the people tracking the lunar flights with giant radio antennas
around the world to lie ... well, if NASA got away with it once, would the
agency be so stupid as to try to get away with this world-class hoax nine
times?

The claim is too dumb not to be laughable.  It is sad.  We as a people
would rather think the worst of ourselves than the best.

Nevertheless, scientific investigators investigated.

Myth-believers claimed that Neil and Buzz could have only left such firm,
defined bootprints in soil with moisture - and everyone knows there is no
water on the moon, right?

Wrong. There’s now evidence there could be water ice at the poles, but
that hasn’t a thing to do with the first footprints on the moon.

Close examination of the lunar soil back on earth showed it to be virgin.
The grains still had their sharp edges. They had not been rounded off by
wind and erosion in an atmosphere.  In their vacuum the sharp edges of
lunar soil cling together, leaving a smooth surface much as moist sand
does on a beach.

"Where were the stars," the myth-believers ask. "Where’s the crater carved
out by Eagle's descent rockets during landing?"

The cameras that NASA sent to the moon had to use short-exposure times to
take pictures of the bright lunar surface and the moonwalkers' white
spacesuits. Stars’ images were too faint and underexposed to be seen, as
they are in photographs taken from Earth orbit.  And why didn’t the
descent rockets carve out a crater?  Their thrust was simply too weak to
make a huge dent in the lunar surface.


So much to see, so little time

For Neil and Buzz there was so much to see and do and so little time. 
They moved their television camera 60 feet from Eagle. This would help
Earth’s viewers see some of the things they were seeing and let them watch
them going about the business of setting up Apollo 11’s experiments.

The two had problems jamming the pole that held the American flag into the
lunar surface.  Though a metal rod held the flag extended, the subsurface
soil was so hard that they had to bang and push on the pole to get it to
barely remain erect. Their forcible actions left the flag’s staff rocking
back and forth for an unusual length of time.

Ah, said the myth-believers. That’s wind blowing the flag, and everyone
knows there’s no wind on the moon. Right?

Right, there’s no wind on the moon. No atmosphere, just vacuum. And
everyone knows an object that is forced into repeating motions in vacuum
repeats many more times than it does in atmosphere. Atmospheric drag
dampens movement. Vacuum is nothing. No resistance.

The flag’s motion was later duplicated in a vacuum chamber at the Marshall
Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

No fraud, no conspiracy.

With Old Glory standing, Neil moved off to take more pictures while Buzz
set up a seismometer to gather information on quakes and meteorites
hitting the moon.  An instrument to measure the flow of radiation
particles inside the solar wind and a multi-mirror target for returning
laser beams fired from Earth were deployed - laser reflectors that have
been used by American universities and Russian institutes and other global
investigators to determine the distance between Earth and the moon to the
inch.

Those laser reflectors could not have been used if Neil and Buzz had not
put them there.

Just days ago, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, launched last month
from Cape Canaveral, returned its first images of the Apollo moon landing
sites. The pictures show five of the six Apollo descent stages, including
Apollo 11's, resting on the moon's surface.  The Apollo 14 landing area
shows a faint trail of Alan Shepard and Edgar Mitchell's two-mile
round-trip march to Cone Crater with their "rickshaw."

Guess we really did go to the moon, huh? So much for the myth-believers
and the conspiracy theorists.

In the lunar dust, the two Americans placed mementos for the five
astronauts and cosmonauts who had lost their lives, and Neil read the
words on a plaque mounted on Eagle's descent stage:  “Here men from the
planet Earth first set foot upon the moon, July 1969, A.D. We came in
peace for all mankind.”

Neil and Buzz gathered about 46 pounds of lunar materials, and once
everything was loaded for flight back to Earth, they shut down the first
moonwalk.


Was Buzz Aldrin a publicity hog? No!

Because of the primitive state of television at the time, most of us
couldn’t wait for Apollo 11 to get back with all the great pictures the
crew had shot. That in itself was the beginning of yet another controversy.

When all the film had been developed, there was only one image out of the
121 Hasselblad still-camera photographs that showed Neil on the moon, plus
the film from a 16mm movie camera that was set up to peer out one of
Eagle's windows. Neil had taken great shots of Buzz moving about, Aldrin
took only one rear shot of Neil stowing samples for return to Earth.

Why?

Was Buzz angry?

No.

“I was the one with the camera,” Neil told me. “His job was to set up the
experiments. He had much to do. Nothing more than that.”

Two months ago I had the same conversation with Buzz, and got a similar
response. “NASA should have trained us in public relations,” he said with
passion. “We were just doing our job.”

Reply via email to