From: Chris de Morsella [mailto:cdemorse...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 9:57 AM
To: tdemorse...@multiculturaladvantage.com
Subject: RE: New Model of the Universe Says Past Crystallizes out of the
Future

 

Now.. It all becomes crystal clear J

Chris

 

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/24497/

 

 

Tuesday, December 08, 2009


New Model of the Universe Says Past Crystallizes out of the Future


What do you get when the past crystallizes out of the future? According to a
new model of the universe that combines relativity and quantum mechanics,
the answer is: the present. 

http://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/files/35233/Crystallising-block-u
nivers.gif

What's the difference between the past and the future? Not a great deal, if
you take a purely relativistic view of the universe, say George Ellis from
the University of Cape Town in South Africa and Tony Rothman from Princeton
University in New Jersey. 

The standard spacetime diagrams used in relativity accord no special status
to the past, the present or the future. That's because they assume that
everything evolves from time-reversible local physics.

In fact, it is possible represent such a universe using a kind of spacetime
diagram in which space and time merge into a single entity. "The universe
just is: a fixed spacetime block,"say Ellis and Rothman. In this view, no
instant has any special status: "All past and future times are equally
present, and the present "now" is just one of an infinite number." 

This kind of "block universe" has indeed been studied by various physicists
in recent decades with limited impact.

Today, Ellis and Rothman introduce a significant new type of block universe.
They say the character of the block changes dramatically when quantum
mechanics is thrown into the mix. All of a sudden, the past and the future
take on entirely different characteristics. The future is dominated by the
weird laws of quantum mechanics in which objects can exist in two places at
the same time and particles can be so deeply linked that they share the same
existence. By contrast, the past is dominated by the unflinching certainty
of classical mechanics. 

What's interesting is that the transition between these states takes place
largely in the present. It's almost as if the past crystallizes out of the
future, in the instant we call the present. Ellis and Rothman call this
model the "crystallizing block universe" and go on to explore some of its
properties. 

They point out, for example, that this crystallization process doesn't take
place entirely in the present. In quantum mechanics the past can sometimes
be delayed, for example in delayed choice experiments. This means the
structure of the transition from future to past is more complex than a
cursory thought might suggest. 

Ellis and Rothman suggest that their model provides a straightforward
solution to the problem of the origin of the arrow of time. "The arrow of
time arises simply because the future does not yet exist," they say. 

That's a thought-provoking but ultimately unconvincing model in its current
form. But it'll be interesting to see whether Ellis and Rothman can conjure
a little more substance from the idea. 

What it needs, of course, are some testable predictions, things that
cosmologists usually spend little time worrying about. Don't hold your
breath.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/0912.0808: Time and Spacetime: The Crystallizing Block
Universe

<<image001.gif>>

Reply via email to