Hi all, I agree with Stéfan that a forward-looking clean break would be best. It looks like a rather large undertaking though, judging from https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405 <https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/5405>.
Regards, Steve > On Dec 31, 2016, at 1:29 PM, Stefan van der Walt <stef...@berkeley.edu> wrote: > > Hi François > > Thanks for bringing this up. I've now started using pytest for new projects, > and I think it's possible to have a test suite that runs under both that and > nose. However, I'm not sure if such backward compatibility gives us > significant advantage, and suggest we make pytest the recommended and default > way of running the test suite. > > Best regards > Stéfan > > > On December 31, 2016 02:43:04 François Boulogne <fboulo...@sciunto.org> wrote: > >> Hello Nelle, >> >> Thank you for your nice proposition, it's really appreciated. To me, >> this sounds like the way to move but let's wait for other reactions. >> >> Best, >> >> -- >> François Boulogne. >> http://www.sciunto.org >> GPG: 32D5F22F >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-image mailing list >> scikit-image@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image > > > _______________________________________________ > scikit-image mailing list > scikit-image@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
