Hi, YXDragon On Fri, Jun 30, 2017, at 01:46, imag...@sina.com wrote: > Now I think It is time to build a project named skimg-plgs[1]. > And I had wrote some presentative demo[2] with friendly interact. > these demo are all from the gallery, (interactive snake contours, > interactive watershed...) I want to build a full plugin system > and tool set covering scikit-image's every module. Then we can > build a large user community like ImageJ, not only programers but > also the doctors and biologists. Given the immense success of projects such as ImageJ, and based on feedback I've received from practitioners in microscopy, there is certainly a market for a GUI built on top of scikit-image. I don't personally have the time to contribute to such an effort at the moment (my focus is probably best spent keeping skimage on track!), but I am appreciative of the work you are doing, and encourage you to continue. I may have mentioned this to you before, but I am not sure about the long- term viability of WXPython. I heard that they have a Phoenix rewrite underway, but looking at the latest PyPI release (https://pypi.python.org/pypi/wxPython/4.0.0a1) they also only support Windows and MacOS. With a Jupyter Lab release imminent, I would strongly consider using the web as UI, and building components that integrate with that project. I can put you in contact with their developers, if you like. Best regards Stéfan
Links: 1. https://github.com/Image-Py/skimg-plgs 2. https://github.com/Image-Py/skimg-plgs
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
