Hi Juan:What do you mean "undoing the speed regression of watershed"? I found
watershed run very slowly with large image, and I am writting one with numba.
YXDragon
----- 原始邮件 -----
发件人：Juan Nunez-Iglesias <[email protected]>
收件人：scikit-image List Mailing <[email protected]>,
"Mailing_list_for_scikit-image_(http://scikit-image.org)"
<[email protected]>
主题：Re: [scikit-image] Release date for 0.14
日期：2017年09月01日 21点48分
Hi Egor,
Thanks for your support! I would prefer Nov 15 because I know for a fact that I
will struggle to finish some of the major PRs that I need to get in before
0.14, including undoing the speed regression of watershed, and nd moments. (For
the first one I don’t even know where to start currently.)
Juan.
On 1 Sep 2017, 12:31 PM +0300, Egor Panfilov <[email protected]>, wrote:
Dear all,
I propose to set a release date for scikit-image 0.14 on the mid of October
(15th should do). Also, I'd volunteer to be a release manager for the release.
Please, let me know if you agree. If so, I kindly ask you to take a deep breath
and try to review some of the scheduled PRs in the coming month.
Thanks in advance, and have a nice we!
Regards,
Egor Panfilov
_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________
scikit-image mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
