Thanks for letting me know, Juan. I'd also like to hear from the rest of the community---what are your thoughts? Stéfan
On Wed, Oct 25, 2017, at 01:58, Juan Nunez-Iglesias wrote: > +1 from me. I specifically like having external people to report > incidents to.> > Juan. > > On 25 Oct 2017, 5:33 AM +1100, Stefan van der Walt > <stef...@berkeley.edu>, wrote:> >> Hi, everyone >> >> SciPy just merged their Code of Conduct documents after a long >> discussion [0]: >> >> >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/source/dev/conduct/code_of_conduct.rst>> >> >> https://github.com/scipy/scipy/blob/master/doc/source/dev/conduct/report_handling_manual.rst>> >> >> I have been hesitant to include anything similar for scikit-image >> before>> (other than http://scikit-image.org/community_guidelines.html ), >> because>> I did not feel comfortable with the aloof policing tone typically >> employed in similar documents elsewhere. >> >> But, I think the SciPy documents make an important statement >> about our>> vision for an inclusive community, and does so in a friendly >> but >> serious>> way. >> >> How would you feel about adopting these documents for scikit-image?>> >> Best regards >> Stéfan >> >> [0]: https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/7963 >> _______________________________________________ >> scikit-image mailing list >> scikit-image@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image > > _________________________________________________ > scikit-image mailing list > scikit-image@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
_______________________________________________ scikit-image mailing list scikit-image@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/scikit-image
